Discussion Question Number Two: Part Nine

Mission Critical Website


The Mission Critical website honestly did not make me want to go any further about learning about anything with the numerous links it provided within the webpage. I felt the usefulness was definitely there, as it provided loads of information and directories that lead you into knowledge. However, the overwhelming amount of information can really put back a person into finding a more simpler, more organized webpage that still had the ability to retain most of the information, but in a less intense manner.

There is no doubt that I learned quite a bit. All the examples provided in almost every section, just as the Causation website provided, helped tremendously in allowing for the understanding of many concepts sink in. I'd always forget what "Straw Man", and I could certainly come back later to this website to see and jog my memory from this concept that seems to have become somewhat blurry. I realized that Mission Critical provided ideas from learning with an introduction to statements, claims, (basics in learning about arguments) to detailed concepts and diagrams to go with the information presented, as well as, information and exercises to Causal arguments. I really thought it was useful that they provided the exercises that allows you to pick answers, which in then explained if it is a good answer to pick and why or why not, which was excellent to see. It is a very good webpage in allowing the reader to fully envelop themselves in the world of argument. And by simply putting aside the overwhelming feeling from all the links, you can learn indefinitely.